Ms. Hanley has published an article this morning which includes an interview with Peter Hogg, "Canada's leading scholar in constitutional law." In it, she asserts Liberal Leader Michael Ignatieff pledged to abandon the practice of prorogation, should he become Prime Minister. Mr.Hogg takes the statement as truth and advises against it. However, Hanley's version of what Ignatieff said, is wrong.
Ignatieff is now pledging, if he becomes prime minister, to never prorogue Parliament.What Ignatieff actually said.
Hogg said that's not a wise promise to make.
"It is quite normal to have several sessions of Parliament in the course of the life of a Parliament," the professor said.
"If Mr. Ignatieff were elected and had a majority and his government continued for four years, he might want to have more that one session. That would require prorogation."
Liberal Leader Michael Ignatieff says he would never prorogue Parliament to avoid controversy if he became prime minister.
....telling reporters that while prorogation is a legitimate constitutional power, using it to avoid "tight spots" is completely unacceptable.
"To use it every time you're in a tight spot seems to me is a flagrant abuse of a constitutional power and that's why Canadians are angry about it," said Ignatieff. "So therefore, I take from this a commitment not to do the same thing, period."

RSS
Like
Follow

3 comments: