Enough said.
"But we have to make clear to our Israeli friends and partners that the two-state solution -- which we support, which the prime minister himself says he supports -- requires confidence-building measures on both sides," Clinton told CNN's Jill Dougherty. "And the announcement of the settlements the very day that the vice president was there was insulting."
"I mean, it was just really a very unfortunate and difficult moment for everyone -- the United States, our vice president who had gone to reassert our strong support for Israeli security -- and I regret deeply that that occurred and made that known."
Abraham H. FoxmanSTFU, Abe. Seriously! This is Foxman's m.o. I have written a little about his tactics, in the past. He went after Bill Moyers last year, and Moyers humiliated Abe with his rebuttal. Here is a snippet.
We are shocked and stunned at the Administration's tone and public dressing down of Israel on the issue of future building in Jerusalem. We cannot remember an instance when such harsh language was directed at a friend and ally of the United States. One can only wonder how far the U.S. is prepared to go in distancing itself from Israel in order to placate the Palestinians in the hope they see it is in their interest to return to the negotiating table.
Dear Mr. Foxman:
First, to call someone a racist for lamenting the slaughter of civilians by the Israeli military offensive in Gaza is a slur unworthy of the tragedy unfolding there. Your resort to such a tactic is reprehensible
Contrary to your claim, I made no reference whatsoever to “moral equivalency” between Hamas and Israel. That is an old canard often resorted to by propagandists trying to divert attention from facts on the ground, and, it, too, is unworthy of the slaughter in Gaza. Contrary to imputing “moral equivalency” between Hamas and Israel, I said that “Hamas would like to see every Jew in Israel dead.” I said that “a radical stream of Islam now seeks to eliminate Israel from the face of the earth.” And I described the new spate of anti-Semitism across the continent of Europe. I am curious as to why you ignored remarks which clearly counter the notion of “moral equivalency.”
"Consistent with the positions of the United States, the European Union, the United Nations and other key partners, the Canadian government sees the construction of permanent settlements in East Jerusalem as an obstacle to the prospects for peace,"Translation: "We really don't want to upset you Israel, we approve of your ways, but we must be seen as being onside with the rest of the world in this matter. On the bright side, mums the word on the white phosphorus!" wink
"Canada believes that all parties should abide by their international commitments. This announcement does not advance the cause of peace in the region."
it was "regrettable" that Cannon objected to Israel's right to build the settlement, but said his statement was "very mild" compared with Biden's.Frank, you are an imbecile who lives in a fantasy world. What you consider very strong, fair support of Israel, is absolute acceptance of their policies. You may want to heed the words of Vice President Joe Biden, who said to the audience at an Israeli university, "Quite frankly, folks, sometimes only a friend can deliver the hardest truth."
Dimant said he believed the Harper government was motivated to make the statement in order "to appease" the United States.
"I think the Americans may be looking for more counties to voice displeasure with Israel and therefore apply additional pressure to Israel to make even more concessions because, up to now, Obama's policy has been a failure in the Middle East," Dimant said.
"Therefore, I think they probably called on Canada, which is seen as a very strong, fair supporter of Israel, to join in this condemnation."
Last week's budget predicted a $53.8-billion deficit at the close of this fiscal year, falling to $1.8 billion in 2014-15.Page is not saying it can't be done, but additional measures will be needed. A spokesperson for Flaherty dismissed Page's projections because his private sector buddies say Jim is the awesome.
Page said the deficit will likely still be $12.3 billion at that time.
The disparity stems from Page projecting $6 billion less in corporate tax revenues, and about $4.5 billion higher spending, in part due to higher service charges on the national debt
"We need to preserve traditional values for the future of our children. Children must be raised with morals and principles. As a society, we must provide them with a secured and loving environment that allows them to flourish."Yes, we must protect the children!!! I suggest the courts intervene and forbid the Senator from having contact with any of his children.
RSS
Like
Follow
2 comments: